n
CaseLaw
This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Owerri Division, in Appeal No. CA/OW/164/2011, delivered on the 28th day of May, 2012, in which the court dismissed the appeal of the Appellants against the ruling of the Federal High Court in Suit No. FHC/OW/CS/75/2011 delivered on the 1st day of April, 2011, in which the court overruled the preliminary objection of the Appellant against the jurisdiction of that court to hear and determine the matter.
On the 14th day of March, 2011, the 1st Respondent caused a writ of summons to be issued against the Appellants and 2nd Respondent in which he claimed the following reliefs:-
It is the case of the 1st Respondent who was the Plaintiff in the trial court that he and the 1st Appellant are members of the 2nd Appellant and contested the party's primary election to select the candidate for Ehime Mbano/Ihitte Uboma/Obowo, aka Okigwe South Federal Constituency of Imo State election scheduled for 2nd April, 2011 which took place on 6th January, 2011; that he scored the highest number of votes cast at the said primary election but rather than forward his name as the duly elected candidate to Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) (2nd Respondent herein) 2nd Appellant sent the name of 1st Appellant who, according to the 1st Respondent, was not qualified to contest the election.
On the other hand, the case of the Appellants is that at the venue of the primary election on 6th January, 2011, 1st Respondent, Dominic A. Nwachukwu, Emmanuel Okewulonu, Innocent Nwokorie stepped down, after accreditation of delegates and announced to the gathering that they had stepped down for the 1st Appellant in the interest of the party and that the only candidate who did not withdraw and thus, contested the primary election with the 1st Appellant was Obe Francis C. Ibezim; that 1st Appellant won the election with a landslide of 510 votes as against 10 votes scored by the opposing candidate; that as a result of the declaration of results, the name of 1st Appellant was duly forwarded to the 2nd Respondent as the candidate of the 2nd Appellant for the election in question, on the 31st day of January 2011; that the Appellants were surprised when they received court processes filed on 14th March, 2011, by the 1st Respondent claiming the reliefs earlier reproduced in this judgment. The Appellants are contesting the authenticity of the primary election documents which 1st Respondent contends evidenced his participation and victory in the primary election.
However, on the 21st day of March, 2011, Chief C. Ekomaru, SAN., for the 1st Appellant filed a motion on notice praying the court to strike out the suit for want of jurisdiction on the following grounds:
The application was supported by an affidavit of 24 paragraphs on which the 1st Appellant relied in moving the court. As stated earlier in this judgment, the trial court, in a considered ruling, overruled the objection resulting in an appeal to the lower court which was dismissed by that court giving rise to the instant further appeals
Whether the courts have jurisdiction to hear and determine an issue arising from a...